Melfi, VickySkyner, Lindsay J.Birke, LyndaWard, Samantha J.Shaw, Wendy S.Hosey, Geoff2021-11-012021-11-012021-10-18Melfi, V., Skyner, L. J., Birke, L., Ward, S. J., Shaw, W. S., & Hosey, G. (2022). Furred and feathered friends: How attached are zookeepers to the animals in their care? Zoo Biology, 41(2), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.216560733-318810.1002/zoo.21656http://hdl.handle.net/10034/626254This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Melfi, V., Skyner, L. J., Birke, L., Ward, S. J., Shaw, W. S., & Hosey, G. (2022). Furred and feathered friends: How attached are zookeepers to the animals in their care? Zoo Biology, 41(2), 122-129], which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21656]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.Keeper-animal relationships (KARs) appear to be important in zoos, since they can enhance the well-being of both the animals and the keepers, can make animal husbandry easier, but conversely might risk inappropriate habituation of animals and possible risks to the safety of keepers. It is, therefore, important to know more about the variables involved in relationship formation. Here we use a modified version of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS) to measure the strength of KARs between keepers and animals in their care, both in the zoo and in the home. LAPS questionnaires were completed by 187 keepers in 19 different collections across three countries. LAPS scores for attachment to zoo animals (ZA) were significantly lower than for pet animals (PA). There was no significant difference in ZA scores between different taxa, but there were significant taxon differences between PA scores. There were significant differences in both ZA and PA scores between different collections. Female respondents scored more highly than males for both ZA and PA. Multiple regression revealed that location, gender, and time spent with animals were significant predictors for ZA, while only gender and taxon were significant predictors for PA. It was concluded that PA scores were comparable with those for the general public, and reflected strong attachment of keepers to their pets, while ZA scores, although also reflecting attachment, were influenced by differences in institutional culture. [Abstract copyright: © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.]attachmentpetkeeper-animal relationships (KAR)zooLexington Attachment to Pet Scale (LAPS)Article1098-2361Zoo Biology2021-11-0141