Ellis, RogerHogard, Elaine2012-06-062012-06-062006-07-01Evaluation, 2006, 12(3), pp. 372-3831356-389010.1177/1356389006069140http://hdl.handle.net/10034/227592This article is not available through ChesterRep.This article describes a distinctive approach to programme evalution used in over forty funded evaluations in the Social and Health Evaluation Unit at the University of Chester. It categories the questions asked by evaluators into three main groups: those concerned with outcomes and impact; those concerned with process; and those representing the views of the stakeholders involved in the programme.enArchived with thanks to Evaluationprogramme evaluationArticleEvaluation