Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Why Are Most Humans Right-Handed? The Modified Fighting Hypothesis

Larsson, Matz
Schepman, Astrid
Rodway, Paul
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
EPub Date
Publication Date
2023-04-19
Submitted Date
Collections
Other Titles
Abstract
Humans show a population-level preference for using the right hand. The fighting hypothesis is an influential theory that suggests that left-handedness persists because its rarity provides a surprise advantage in fighting interactions, and that left-handedness is less frequent because it has a health cost. However, evidence for the health cost of left-handedness is unsubstantiated, leaving the greater frequency of right-handers unexplained. Research indicates that homicide may have been common in early hominins. We propose that the hand used to hold a weapon by early hominins could have influenced the outcome of a fight, due to the location of the heart and aorta. A left-handed unilateral grip exposes the more vulnerable left hemithorax towards an opponent, whereas a right-hand unilateral grip exposes the less vulnerable right hemithorax. Consequently, right-handed early ancestors, with a preference for using the right forelimb in combat, may have had a lower risk of a mortal wound, and a fighting advantage. This would explain their greater frequency. In accordance with the original fighting hypothesis, we also suggest that left-handed fighters have a surprise advantage when they are rare, explaining their persistence. We discuss evidence for the modified fighting hypothesis, its predictions, and ways to test the theory.
Citation
Larsson, M., Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2023). Why Are most humans right-handed? The modified fighting hypothesis. Symmetry, 15(4), 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040940
Publisher
MDPI
Journal
Symmetry
Research Unit
DOI
10.3390/sym15040940
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
Description
Series/Report no.
ISSN
No print ISSN
EISSN
2073-8994
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
Additional Links
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040940