Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

No evidence against Sketch Reinstatement of Context, Verbal Labels or the use of Registered Intermediaries for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Response to Henry et al. (2017)

Dando, Coral J.
Ormerod, Thomas C.
Cooper, Penny
Marchant, Ruth
Mattison, Michelle
Milne, Rebecca
Bull, Ray
Other Titles
Abstract
Recently, Henry et al. (2017) found no evidence for the use of Verbal labels, Sketch Reinstatement of Context and Registered Intermediaries by forensic practitioners when interviewing children with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. We consider their claims, noting the limited ecological validity of the experimental paradigm, the impacts of repeated interviewing where retrieval support is not provided at first retrieval, question the interviewer/intermediary training and their population relevant experience, and comment on the suppression of population variances. We submit that rejecting these techniques on the basis of this study is completely unwarranted and potentially damaging, particularly if used in legal proceedings to undermine the value of testimony from children with ASD, who continually struggle to gain access to justice.
Citation
Dando, C. J., Ormerod, T. C., Cooper, P., Marchant, R., Mattison, M. L. A., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2018). No evidence against Sketch Reinstatement of Context, Verbal Labels or the use of Registered Intermediaries for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Response to Henry et al. (2017). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(7), 2593-2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3479-z
Publisher
Springer
Journal
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Research Unit
DOI
10.1007/s10803-018-3479-z
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
en
Description
The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3479-z
Series/Report no.
ISSN
EISSN
1573-3432
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
Additional Links
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10803-018-3479-z