Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Treatment patterns and health outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted systemic therapies in the UK

Hawkins, Robert; email: robert.e.hawkins@manchester.ac.uk
Fife, Kate
Hurst, Michael
Wang, Meng
Naicker, Niroshini
Nolasco, Sarah
Eisen, Tim
Matakidou, Athena
Gordon, Jason
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Affiliation
EPub Date
Publication Date
2020-07-17
Submitted Date
2020-03-23
Collections
Other Titles
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted systemic therapies have demonstrated favourable outcomes in randomised controlled trials, however real-world evidence is limited. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of targeted systemic therapies for patients with mRCC in routine clinical practice in the UK. Methods: A retrospective, observational, longitudinal study based on chart review of newly diagnosed adult mRCC patients treated at two UK hospitals from 2008 to 2015 was conducted. Targeted systemic therapies recommended for use in mRCC patients were evaluated across first to third lines of therapy (1LOT-3LOT). Important exclusions were treatment with cytokine therapy and within non-standard of care clinical trials. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); data were analysed descriptively and using Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Results: 652 patients (65.3% male, 35.0% ≥70 years) were included. In 1LOT, 98.5% of patients received sunitinib or pazopanib. In 2LOT and 3LOT, 99.0 and 94.4% received axitinib or everolimus. Median OS was 12.9, 6.5 and 5.9 months at 1LOT, 2LOT and 3LOT respectively. Estimated OS at 1-year was 52.4% (95% CI: 48.6–56.4%) in 1LOT, 31.5% (25.2–39.5%) in 2LOT and 23.8% (10.1–55.9%) in 3LOT. Median OS from 1LOT in favourable, intermediate and poor MSKCC were 39.7, 15.8 and 6.1 months respectively. Conclusions: In this study, treatment was consistent with current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for mRCC patients. Although the study population favoured poorer prognosis patients, outcomes were more favourable than those for England at the same time. However, overall survival in this ‘real-world’ population remains poor and indicates significant unmet need for effective and safe treatment options to improve survival among mRCC patients.
Citation
BMC Cancer, volume 20, issue 1, page 670
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal
Research Unit
DOI
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
article
Language
Description
From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router
History: received 2020-03-23, accepted 2020-07-08, registration 2020-07-09, pub-electronic 2020-07-17, online 2020-07-17, collection 2020-12
Publication status: Published
Funder: Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Series/Report no.
ISSN
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
Additional Links