Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

What’s so naïve about naïve realism?

Raineri, Carlo; orcid: 0000-0003-2011-0322; email: Carlo.raineri@manchester.ac.uk
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Affiliation
EPub Date
Publication Date
2021-03-08
Submitted Date
Collections
Other Titles
Abstract
Abstract: Naïve Realism claims that veridical perceptual experiences essentially consist in genuine relations between perceivers and mind-independent objects and their features. The contemporary debate in the philosophy of perception has devoted little attention to assessing one of the main motivations to endorse Naïve Realism–namely, that it is the only view which articulates our ‘intuitive’ conception of perception. In this paper, I first clarify in which sense Naïve Realism is supposed to be ‘naïve’. In this respect, I argue that it is put forward as the only view which can take our introspective knowledge of perception at face value, and I identify the two (alleged) key features of such introspective knowledge. Second, I challenge the claim that one of these features-namely, that it seems as one could not be in the same perceptual state unless the putative objects of perception existed and were perceived–is introspectively evident. Consequently, I argue that a view of perceptual experience–such as Intentionalism–which denies that this feature is true of perception can still take introspection at face value. This undermines the claim that Naïve Realism is the only account which accommodates our intuitions on the nature of perception.
Citation
Philosophical Studies, volume 178, issue 11, page 3637-3657
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Journal
Research Unit
DOI
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
article
Language
Description
From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router
History: accepted 2021-02-01, registration 2021-02-01, online 2021-03-08, pub-electronic 2021-03-08, pub-print 2021-11
Publication status: Published
Series/Report no.
ISSN
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
Additional Links